That means a family of four can potentially save 3 114 67 236 10 2 878 57 each year by switching from bottled water to a water filter.
Nrdc bottled water.
Much more information can be found in nrdc s report.
The nrdc recently completed a four year study of bottled water which included testing more than 1000 bottles of 103 brands of bottled water.
119 filters 96 water bottles 20 pitcher 1 10 water from the tap 236 10.
The nrdc found that at least one sample of about one third of the tested water contained significant contamination where significant contamination means that it violated standards or guidelines.
He says that meaningful oversight of this extremely.
This is a huge multibillion dollar industry selling a product that is viewed by many consumers as safer than tap water says erik olson senior director of health and food at the natural resources defense council nrdc which published a four year bottled water study in 1999.
Nrdc s march 1999 petition to the fda and attached report are the results of our four year study of the bottled water industry including its bacterial and chemical contamination problems.
An overview of nrdc s and others surveys chapter 4 37 gaping holes in government bottled water regulation chapter 5 65 misleading bottled water labeling and marketing.
Bottled water pure drink or pure hype.
Bottled water may be a useful short term source of drinking water in emergencies but it shouldn t be a permanent solution because it is not necessarily cleaner or safer than tap water.
You can also get a glimpse at the truth behind bottled water by checking out tapped.
In 1999 after a four year review of the bottled water industry and its safety standards nrdc concluded that there is no assurance that bottled water is cleaner or safer than tap.
The natural resources defense council s report bottled water.
Unfortunately the biggest effect may well be that of.
Pure drink or pure hype.